11138 shaares
99 private links
99 private links
1464 results
tagged
AMERICAN_POLITICS
Is this a new progressive thing?
I swear that Beto looks like he has some sort of disorder
I swear that Beto looks like he has some sort of disorder
CD7 really needs to be recovered from this woman
Need to come back to this
Second.
100%.
100%.
He promised to reduce America's commitment to endless war.
The rollout was typical Trump goofy, but it's hard to see how this is controversial among his base voters or even a majority of voters.
The hawks, some of whom I respect, have never made a good case for Syria as a key foreign policy interest of the US. Time's up!
The rollout was typical Trump goofy, but it's hard to see how this is controversial among his base voters or even a majority of voters.
The hawks, some of whom I respect, have never made a good case for Syria as a key foreign policy interest of the US. Time's up!
I do not want to suggest that FiveThirtyEight is bad at their craft. They are, likely, the best poll aggregator in the business.
// I don't think the author means that to cut so hard, but it kind of does :)
// I don't think the author means that to cut so hard, but it kind of does :)
Your regular reminder that this sensible guy was MUCH too controversial for The Atlantic.
The midterm election results in Texas weren’t exactly an occasion for Republican whoopin’ and hollerin’. Ted Cruz narrowly held his Senate seat against Beto O’Rourke, and previously secure House Members such as John Culberson and Pete Sessions lost in the suburbs.
//
*sigh* Culberson's district has some suburban characteristics, but it not "the suburbs"
Generally agree with the larger point of the editorial though.
//
*sigh* Culberson's district has some suburban characteristics, but it not "the suburbs"
Generally agree with the larger point of the editorial though.
** This is what happens when conservatives fall into the liberal trap of thinking they can use the courts to achieve policy goals that need to be won in Congress. **
*sigh*
Another take: This editorial is what happens when WSJ elites think bad constitutional law should be ignored because of their desired political ends.
*sigh*
Another take: This editorial is what happens when WSJ elites think bad constitutional law should be ignored because of their desired political ends.
What I wouldn't give for this kind of journo in Houston