A Pro-Trade Party No Longer (Cont'd)
Lessons on CAFTA (Washington Times, via PowerLine)
The Senate's narrow approval of CAFTA represents the fifth major free-trade bill to pass the upper chamber of Congress since Bill Clinton entered the White House. The previous landmark trade bills passed by the Senate include the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1993, the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1994, the approval of permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) with China in 2000 and granting the president trade-promotion authority, formerly known as fast-track, in 2002.
To his credit, Mr. Clinton repeatedly spent political capital promoting the free-trade agenda. Throughout his presidency, Mr. Clinton enthusiastically embraced that agenda, despite the fact that many in the Democratic Party had become increasingly protectionist, especially in the House.
Regrettably, the recent CAFTA vote represented a major step toward protectionism within the Senate Democratic Caucus, particularly among those who aspire to become president. Only 23 percent of Senate Democrats (10 of 43) voted for CAFTA. That compares unfavorably to the 41 percent of Democrats (20 of 49) who supported giving President Bush trade-promotion authority, which he used to negotiate CAFTA; the 84 percent (37 of 44) who voted for PNTR with China; the 76 percent (41 of 54) who voted to create the WTO; and the 49 percent (27 of 55) who supported NAFTA.
None of the Senate Democrats who are frequently mentioned as presidential candidates voted for CAFTA. Joe Biden, who supported NAFTA, the WTO and PNTR with China, voted against CAFTA. Longtime, self-styled internationalist John Kerry, who voted for NAFTA, the WTO, PNTR with China and trade-promotion authority, suddenly reversed course and opposed CAFTA. Evan Bayh, who entered the Senate after the NAFTA and WTO votes, supported PNTR and trade-promotion authority but voted against CAFTA. Hillary Clinton, who has been brandishing her seat on the Senate Armed Services Committee as prima facie evidence of her internationalism and national-security credentials, voted against CAFTA and against granting Mr. Bush trade-promotion authority, which Mr. Clinton desperately wanted (and deserved to have) after it had expired in 1994.
The Washington Times and PowerLine were both behind the PubliusTX.net curve on this one. That doesn't happen very often.
Posted by Kevin Whited @ 07/15/05 22:08 | American Politics | Technorati
Previous Entry | Home | Next Entry
TrackBack
There are currently no trackbacks for this item.
Incoming trackback pings have been disabled because of abusive spammers. Technorati is now used to track cross-blog conversation.
Comments
No comments yet. Add yours?
Add Comments
While it is not required, creating an account for commenting provides a number of benefits (such as comment editing and bypassing the captcha challenge). You may log in to your account here.
No flames or impolite behavior. Any questions, see the site policies. Older posts are moderated (because of spammers), so if your post does not appear immediately, that could be why.
HTML will be stripped. URLs will be transformed into hyperlinks.
[b]text[/b] will produce bold text. [i]text[/i] will produce italicized text.
Comments for this post must be approved before being published. Thank you!
BLOG
» Create Account
» Log In
DISCLAIMER
Content and design copyright © 1997-2008, Kevin Whited.
Posts represent the views of Kevin Whited (and occasional guest bloggers) only, and do not necessarily reflect the views of employers, family, friends, or significant others.